Share This Page

Hardly synonymous

| Saturday, May 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

I disagree with Eric Rosenquist, writer of the letter “Conservatives should conserve” (May 5 and TribLIVE.com), on several points.

Defined for the beginner, “conservation” relates to the protection of animals, plants and natural resources. “Conservative” relates to a philosophy of conservatism. The two words are not related and not synonyms, but just have some of the same letters of the alphabet.

Democracy is not guaranteed by the Constitution, as we are not a democracy. If one can recite the Pledge of Allegiance, then one will know the answer (or for those who cannot: “and to the republic for which it stands”).

Because “conservative” and “conserve” are of no relation, the whole point of Rosenquist's letter is moot. As my husband would say, words mean things, and this is a perfect example of that.

Laura M. McDonald

Washington, Pa.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.