Guns, marketing & kids
Published: Thursday, May 9, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Guns, marketing & kids
Another gun tragedy involving children was reported by The Associated Press in the news story “Kentucky boy, 5, fires ‘my first rifle,' killing his toddler sister” (May 2 and TribLIVE.com).
The guns are made small now for little hands, in pink and blue, and marketed to kids not old enough to play most board games.
When I was a child, it was understood that a gun was something you had to grow into, both mentally and physically. It wasn't a toy. It wasn't something made for children.
I grew up in the 1950s, enjoying all the outdoor sports. I was never allowed near my father's guns until I was old enough to understand the dangers.
My first lesson in shooting was gun safety, care and cleaning. At 13, I was permitted to shoot a BB gun; at 16, I learned to shoot a .22-caliber rifle. After a lot of target practice, I began hunting small game.
Gun manufacturers back then sold to adults. With the help of the NRA's lobbyists, today they market to children.
The result? A dead 2-year-old and a 5-year-old with no little sister to play with and protect, but a tiny grave to visit often.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fuel tax increase
- Us & them
- Eagles’ plight
- Promotion questionable
- Name game
- Democratic Party’s union wing
- ‘Knockout’ evil
- Zubik is right
- CNG fueling sustainability
- Media’s mass hypnosis