| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Bad for farmers, eaters

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Sunday, May 12, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

In reference to the news story “Proposed farm filming ban ignites rights debate in Pennsylvania” (May 6 and As a local farmer, I oppose House Bill 683 proposed by state Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria. And I find his justification for the bill disingenuous as well.

As a farmer who raises beef on grass, I am happy to have the people who eat the food that I produce see how I raise my animals. Food is not just another product; we ingest it to nourish ourselves, and there needs to be complete transparency between those of us who produce it and all of us who eat it. This open communication is the basis of all good relationships, and a good relationship with all my customers is what I want as a farmer.

It is also the basis of why the Pennsylvania Farmers Union (PFU) does not support HB 683. The PFU supports not just family farms, but the idea that each eater is entitled to know where food comes from. Any legislation that, for whatever reason, tries to limit eaters' right to know how and where their food is produced is antithetical to the objectives of conscientious farmers and their customers.

As a farmer, I want to strengthen my relationship with those who eat the food that is the result of my work. The PFU is an organization of like-minded farmers, and we cannot agree to anything that impedes easy communication and understanding. No, HB 683 serves the all-too-transparent desire of the food industry to rob its customers of the right to know where their food comes from. It serves the interests of neither conscientious farmers nor the food-eating public.

Kim Miller

Ligonier Township

The writer is president of the Pennsylvania Farmers Union (

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. ‘Deflategate’ fault NFL’s
  2. States & secession
  3. Major issue, no action
  4. USW not cause of ATI woes
  5. Catholicism & science
  6. Not one-sided
  7. Outrageous & delusional
  8. Seal the borders
  9. Inspiring & welcome
  10. Bright lines: Budget battle
  11. Taxing tobacco II