Unions can, churches can't?
We are informed regularly by the media that one labor union or another is backing a particular candidate for political office, ostensibly because the candidate's platform will benefit that organization's cause(s) — for example, in the news story “Experts: Unions can play powerful role in elections” (May 6 and TribLIVE.com) by Bob Bauder.
Consider that I have been told by more than one clergyman that churches cannot back political candidates without losing their tax-exempt status. I am therefore puzzled why labor unions can back political candidates without losing their tax-exempt status.
Please do not bother to use the phrase “separation of church and state.” Nowhere in the Constitution is that phrase ever used.
The First Amendment reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” It does not say that churches cannot express their opinions. That violates their First Amendment rights.
Anthony F. Cugini
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ATI crying poor again
- Stop naming shooters
- EPA, methane & health
- Give Vick second chance
- Personal fiscal restraint needed
- e_SSLqProgressive’ should be ‘regressive’
- Producers, consumers hurt
- Don’t blame the union
- Confederate pride: Why?
- Cops, stars shine
- Overgrown North Versailles property needs attention