P&M 'legend' not true
Some of the information in the “Dining” review, “Delivering the secret recipe,” (Ticket, April 11) about P&M Pizza needs to be clarified. The article tried to tell the story of P&M's origins to the present, but it mixed fact with fiction.
P&M was established in 1945 by our father, Mooney Martz, and a business associate. Mooney and his brother, Lefty, ran P&M for most of its existence. The creator of the original — and famous — P&M pizza pie recipe was Mooney's wife, Teresa, who first made the pizzas in her home. P&M and the recipe were sold in 1995. To the Martz family's knowledge, the recipe has not been sold nor replicated since that time.
The article said the local legend is that the current owner found the recipe behind a wall while remodeling in 2007. Anyone who knew Mooney knows the legend is not true.
Mooney was a man of honesty and conviction. Knowing that someone claims to have obtained that recipe without a sound basis is nothing Mooney would advocate.
And capitalizing on the memory of one of Arnold's legendary men — with whom these owners have no personal connection — is quite disheartening to Mooney's family, who cherish the mythical originator of P&M Pizza.
Carol Martz Ansani
Vonna Martz Horwitz
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pedro must go
- Duty to disclose
- Steel at stake, too
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Oberdorf firing
- Beware this Wolf I
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Good riddance
- PETA & its tactics II
- Lawsuit: Publicity stunt