Successful? Tax it!
Successful? Tax it!
So, now we have the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passing a bill that would empower states to charge sales tax on online purchases, regardless of whether the seller has a physical location in the buyer's state. The idea is to “level the playing field” with “brick and mortar” stores. Why is government's reaction to anything successful to tax it into oblivion?
Here's a thought: How about eliminating the sales tax in all states? Five currently have no sales tax. This would make all the states even (fair share).
The proponents of the bill claim it could confiscate (my term) $25 billion annually for state governments, which probably will be applied toward grossly underfunded state pension plans. Poor planning and ridiculous pension promises in contracts have led states to this financial mess. Let the states file bankruptcy and renegotiate pension plans to a realistic level, and keep the $25 billion for the president. Heck, that'll pay for the remainder of his golf outings on Campaign One.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Corbett better choice
- HUD & Larimer
- Tax hits seniors
- Wolf & ObamaCare
- Thanks to searchers
- Who’s responsible?
- Clueless on law
- Not one more drop
- Restore royalty minimum
- Incomprehensible hatred