ShareThis Page

NK-A problems

| Monday, May 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

NK-A problems

I attended the “meet the candidates” event at the New Kensington Elks on May 4. I am very excited about some of the candidates and happy to have had the opportunity to meet them.

But I was extremely disappointed that New Ken-Arnold School Board members Debra Glushenko and Patrick Petit did not attend. Plus, Mr. Petit isn't listed in the phone book. How can I contact him about my concerns related to his actions in our district?

Our students have fallen behind in everything from test scores to discipline in school to our athletic programs. An $8 million surplus has disappeared under their watch. Kindergarten is being cut to half-day sessions. The decision to use artificial turf on the football field will likely to lead to more concussions.

And Petit still has never explained his role in the school district paying for buses to transport the Ar-Ken Rens football team.

Ron C. Balla said that he was running for the New Kensington council because his dad previously served on the council and his grandfather was ward chairman for years. I don't think a person should run for council because he has a sense of entitlement.

Jerry Allen

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.