ObamaCare in action
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
My hat's off to Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama. I run a small business that provides basic health-care benefits for 20 employees and their families. I just received the annual renewal from our health-care-insurance provider (one of the local giants).
Next year's premium features a 50-percent (you read that correctly) increase to get the same plan. When we renew, our monthly health-care costs will exceed the cost to lease our office space and will become our largest single expense.
At this rate, small businesses will eventually have to use the exchanges provided by the government or go bankrupt. I guess that was the plan all along.
At least we have the satisfaction of knowing we are overpaying for our health care so someone not gainfully employed can sit on the couch at home, watch TV and have a couple of beers and access to free health care. I feel so much better about it.
Patrick A. Hewitt
Upper St. Clair
The writer is managing partner of the law firm Riley, Hewitt, Witte & Romano, PC.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Putin’s actions I
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Obstacles to hiring
- Conspicuous by absence