More than security, sales
In the news story “Gun rights advocates say Westmoreland commissioners' resolution not enough” (April 12 and TribLIVE.com), Commissioner Charles Anderson suggested Westmoreland County deputy sheriffs perform no duties beyond courtroom security and conducting sheriff's sales. This narrow and incomplete characterization paints a false portrait of what these dedicated law-enforcement officers do on a daily basis.
Deputies serve warrants; effect arrests; transport prisoners from jail to court and to hearings before magisterial district justices; guard prisoners at hospitals; handle evictions pursuant to protection-from-abuse (PFA) orders; perform extradition details, transporting prisoners beyond state lines; and perform many other functions to ensure the safety of county citizens.
In the first quarter of 2013 alone, Westmoreland deputies served 451 bench warrants and 1,096 criminal warrants and processed 5,939 magisterial district justice warrants; conducted more than 4,000 prisoner transports; handled over 800 Family Court cases, including PFA proceedings; and spent in excess of 1,200 hours guarding prisoners at hospitals. The sheriff's office's K9 unit was used at 152 incidents involving suspected drug activity.
Also, 414 real estate actions were processed and many other civil actions were completed.
Deputies work hand-in-hand with other law-enforcement agencies, making arrests and deterring crime. The proud men and women of the sheriff's office are dedicated to maintaining public safety and continuing its rich tradition of enforcing laws against individuals in our community who break them.
The writer, a Westmoreland County sheriff's deputy, is president of the Westmoreland County Court-Related Employees Association.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ambrosini’s logic lacking
- Better stores needed
- Treat UNC like PSU
- Superstition’s role
- Intelligent discussion overdue
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Gross in 45th
- Watson in 33rd