Don't stop with Ories
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, June 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Don't stop with Ories
I do not agree that Joan Orie Melvin was punished with “a wet noodle” (editorial, “The Melvin sentence,” May 9). The judge saw the reality of the situation — the Orie sisters are victims of a political witch hunt.
It is true the sisters broke the law. Jane Orie forged evidence used in her defense. That was wrong, but I understand her motive for doing so. To paraphrase “Catch-22” author Joseph Heller, “You aren't paranoid if they really are out to get you.”
I do not understand Allegheny County politics well enough to know why the system went after the Orie sisters, but I know one thing: Probably half of the politicians in this country are guilty of the same crimes. John 8:7 says this: “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”
Joan Orie Melvin and her sisters have been punished. They have been embarrassed. Their legal fees are enormous. Jane went to jail. Joan was fined $55,000.
It is time to put an end to crony politics. Politicians should be put on notice. From now on, all of them should obey campaign re-election laws, including Democrat politicians.
If they break the rules, impose harsh penalties. They have been warned.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shortchanging military
- Term limits’ limits
- Economics dissent
- Do it or shut up
- Kiski board ignores taxpayers
- Touching film
- Money for litter pickup?
- Not for sale
- School staffers’ challenge
- Knives vs. guns I