No need for New Ken change
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
New Kensington Council candidate Ron C. Balla's signs tell us to “say no to the status quo.” In the May 15 letter “Time for Balla,” the writer says “I believe it's time for a change ... time for new thinking and new ideas.” The writer failed to say why we need change or what Balla's “new ideas” are.
Would you change into shorts during a blizzard simply because you have worn a snowsuit for a few days? Change can be the right thing, but only if there is reason to believe the change will make things better. Based on what I've heard from candidate Balla, not only is he not ready for the seat, we can't afford to give up the gains the current council has made.
Ron Balla is a change that we can't afford.
I will be voting for Tom Guzzo for mayor and Todd Mentecki and John Regoli for council. That's because we now have better streets, less crime, improved parks, a larger police force and a wide-network neighborhood watch.
These and many other things prove them to be the right people at the right time.
Donald L. Clay
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Valley musical superb
- Deer Lakes drilling OK
- Resurrection? Really?
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Seek not vengance, but love
- Resurrection is real
- Women, equality & religion II
- Off the rails
- Stop currying Saudis’ favor