I recently had the opportunity to meet and talk with Joseph Nasser, who is running for Brackenridge mayor. He is using misleading information in his campaign.
Mr. Nasser questions the need for a fifth full-time officer and quotes a figure for police overtime. Had he done his research, he would've found that ATI and its contractor reimbursed the borough for police coverage. The taxpayers didn't pay for this.
Nasser wants to hire two part-time officers and furlough a full-time officer. Our officers have a union contract that states we can't use part-time officers if we lay off a full-time officer.
His ideas look good on paper, but are unlikely to generate the savings he claims.
Don't be fooled by a campaign based on “saving money.” His plan of action is misleading and could put Brackenridge in a predicament that will end up costing the residents time, money and peace of mind.
The writer is a former Brackenridge Council president.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Punishment pushback II
- Punishment pushback I
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Help for Tina
- Beware this Wolf II
- Don’t blame bus drivers I
- Beware this Wolf I
- F-35 analysis lousy
- Don’t blame bus drivers II