TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Distorting or ill-informed

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, May 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Ironically, Keystone Research Center executive director Steve Herzenberg's letter “One-sided & ill-informed” (May 15 and TribLIVE.com) about Eric Heyl's column “Here a shot, there a shot: Propaganda flows freely in Pennsylvania debate over liquor stores” (May 4 and TribLIVE.com) is itself replete with factual errors.

Herzenberg writes that a task force of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concludes “privatizing alcohol sales would increase excessive drinking, alcohol-related traffic fatalities and other drinking-related social problems.” But the task-force report makes none of those findings.

In fact, the task-force report notes “research gaps” that include “limited available evidence of effects of privatization on alcohol-related harms” and “insufficient evidence to determine the effects of privatization on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.”

Herzenberg and his government-liquor-union-funded organization are entitled to their opinion, but not their own facts.

I don't know if he is ill-informed or simply distorting the truth, but either way, the claims he makes are demonstrably wrong.

Nathan A. Benefield

Harrisburg

The writer is director of policy analysis for the Commonwealth Foundation (commonwealthfoundation.org).

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Declare war on Wolf, Dems
  2. No makeup days
  3. Bright lines: The president & terror
  4. Symbol of solidarity
  5. Who really benefits?
  6. In depth: Very much alive
  7. Rein in Pa. spending
  8. Public’s picks to make
  9. Declared dead II
  10. JoePa’s ‘asterisk’
  11. Bill vs. Bill