Leechburg to Heritage: Good move
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 9:06 p.m.
Leechburg' Area's move out of the WPIAL and into the Heritage Conference is causing undue concern.
I encourage opponents to visit heritageconference.net to discover what this conference offers. The Heritage is founded on “Academics, Athletics, and Activities.” It offers championship competitions in sports and academics, promotes community involvement and provides scholarship opportunities.
Opponents have complained they were not informed of this move, but the VND published five articles between March 21 and May 8 regarding the Leechburg school board's actions — including one with positive remarks made by students and coaches.
Some claim Leechburg can be competitive, but in looking at all teams over the past four years, Leechburg has a 39 percent winning percentage in the WPIAL.
The Heritage Conference will benefit our student-athletes in sports and academics. If a student is playing “for the love of the game,” then the conference shouldn't matter.
The students who said they will leave Leechburg for other WPIAL schools should be prepared to possibly sit on the bench, as competition for positions will be greater in other districts.
When I was a teacher in rural West Virginia, my students sometimes traveled more than two hours for athletic competitions and many went on to become doctors, lawyers, politicians, etc. And their parents managed to make it to those games.
Don't let “tradition” impede progress for the students of Leechburg Area.
Susan E. Brown
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Enslaving themselves
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history
- Metcalfe wrong
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success