By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, May 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
It was with great interest that I read the news story “Winter bee deaths devastate keepers” (May 19 and TribLIVE.com). It attributed the loss of bees to a disease known as Colony Collapse Disorder, which occurs when worker bees from a hive abruptly disappear. The story goes on to explain that the cause is undetermined.
Well, I think I may know the answer.
Might it be that the “Beehive Workers Association” social programs have expanded so greatly the last four years that the worker bees no longer see any benefit in continuing to toil to bring in the nectar to make the honey, since they receive the same exact remuneration and benefits as the “nonworkers”?
Why should they work their butts off while all the other bees simply take life easy, smelling the flowers and collecting their “benefits”?
And then it dawned on me: Are we not, as a society, gradually succumbing to Colony Collapse Disorder?
Richard J. L e Chard
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Proven success
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions
- Keep Laurel Point
- Funding priorities questioned