“You Jews are egoists when you claim a special emancipation for yourselves as Jews. ... The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.” — Karl Marx, “On the Jewish Question,” 1843.
This statement, made by the liberal working-class hero himself, is quite significant in regard to the current scandals (IRS, Department of Justice/Associated Press/James Rosen). American liberty is under attack from a politically corrupt liberal administration. These cases of political persecution might sound eerily similar to the National Socialist (Nazi) Party's treatment of Jews.
These scandals are simply following suit with the years of hypocrisy within the left wing. Liberals, socialists, communists (or whatever one chooses to call them) for years have been winning the hearts of the people by speaking false claims of equality, fairness, workers' rights, etc. However, as we saw with European socialists' unequal treatment of Jews, we are seeing American liberals' unfair treatment of anything associated with the opposition.
Liberals advocate for freedom of speech and religion. However, what they really desire is freedom of “progressive” speech and a secular state purged of religion.
By silencing the tea party, they can be one step closer to their end game, the emancipation of society from conservatism. In coming weeks, liberals will paint the right wing as “egoists” looking for special treatment out of these scandals.
But what conservatives want isn't special treatment; all they wish for is equal treatment.
Evan J. Tobin
The writer is an Indiana University of Pennsylvania graduate student focusing on political/electoral geography.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.