Heritage move hurts students
The foundation for my child's “Academics, Athletics, and Activities” — the motto of the Heritage Conference — is at Leechburg Area High School. It has nothing to do with the sports conference in which she competes.
Travel is going to be a problem if Leechburg moves to the Heritage. Travel to away activities will regularly be one to two hours. Research done on travel distances in both the WPIAL and Heritage shows students will travel an additional 3,000 miles per year just for sports in the Heritage. This number does not include any chorus, band or academic competitions.
Many of the students feel sports participation will leave them with no time for other activities — no dances, plays, etc. Free time is limited now and the extra travel will lessen it. Students should not be forced to choose between a game they love to play and the ability to have free time. Plus, the travel will cut into their study time.
And what about playing against students they know from other districts? We won't be playing the schools around us. How can we have rivalries against these teams?
This decision will not determine the success of these students, but it will affect their happiness.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Thomas’ ‘humanity’
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Fitz draws ire
- Pols’ real interest
- Mitochondrial disease awareness
- Hope for spinal cord injuries