Gas tax for transit forbidden
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, June 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Joseph P. Kirk, Construction Legislative Council of Western Pennsylvania chairman, Mon Valley Progress Council executive director and writer of the letter “Fund transportation needs” (May 31 and TribLIVE.com), is to be commended for his efforts to get additional funding for mass transit. He strongly implies that mass-transit funding should come from the state gasoline tax and related driver and user fees.
I remind Mr. Kirk and all state legislators that the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article VIII, Section 11, specifically and emphatically prohibits the use of gasoline taxes and all related fees for any other purpose than construction and maintenance of roads and bridges (except certain loans). Mass transit is not included. Our roads and bridges need all of the revenue that gas taxes and user fees can provide.
The state Constitution is very clear on this issue, and I do not understand how promoters and legislators simply ignore the law when talking about funding our mass-transit systems.
I am a firm believer in mass transit, but we need to plug up the money-grabbing holes in the system and find a legal source of revenue.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Valley musical superb
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- In tragedy’s wake I
- Resurrection is real
- Amazing support
- Weighty issue
- Cover many stances
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Tragedy’s ramifications I