By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, June 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The Obama administration is the perfect storm because the press and media did not do their duty.
The Constitution provides the strongest protection for the press because a free country can survive only if its citizens are kept objectively informed about the government. Instead, the media became supporters of and advocates for Obama and his administration. Rather than advocating for the citizens and holding the administration accountable, the media turned a blind eye to dubious actions, stonewalling and misleading responses by Obama, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and others. The media betrayed us.
Under the press cover, Obama displayed a level of arrogance never seen before in a president. This resulted in bolder questionable and perhaps illegal actions, culminating in the current scandal trilogy — Benghazi, the IRS and the attack on the Associated Press and Fox News.
The administration proclaims it knows nothing because it's never been challenged by a critical media. But by stupidly biting the hand that protected it — attacking the AP — the administration now must deal with the press finally doing its job.
Michael G. Bitterice
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Islam & women
- Corbett’s choice
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Invest in pre-K
- Slots & property taxes
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Conspicuous by absence
- Not reviled abroad
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions II