Leave library tax alone
North Apollo Councilmen Ed Barclay, William Campbell and Tom Newton don't like the borough's tax supporting the Apollo Memorial Library. That's because they can't spend it the way they want and it actually helps people.
They say they don't how many North Apollo residents use the library. Neither do I, but every time I go, there are lots of people using the computers, reading newspapers, checking out books, researching in the genealogy section and putting the services available to good use.
More people use the library in a day than attend the monthly council meetings. I used to attend meetings, but our council didn't want to do anything for the people of North Apollo. Getting rid of the 0.75-mill library tax is just a way to take something good from the people because it's not controlled by the politicians.
I'm sure Barclay, Campbell and Newton will find 16 people to sign a petition to place a library tax question on the fall ballot. I really wish they would focus on important matters and leave the library alone.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Good riddance
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Idea for casino
- Punishment pushback II
- Don’t blame bus drivers I
- Don’t blame bus drivers II