Slap in teachers' faces
Regarding the Melan Junik letter “Need a ‘baby tax'” (June 4): What a slap in the face to all educators. For him to write that people become “teachers only because they did not have the brains or ambition to become engineers, scientists or doctors” disgusts me.
They became teachers and educators because they love children, young adults and college students and want to make an impact on the future.
I grew up in a family of educators and teachers, so I speak from experience and knowledge.
It is a fact that people do not like paying school taxes. There are things I would prefer to do with my money. If you do not like paying school taxes, you have the option to sell your house and rent. Senior citizens and people without children in the school system paid for me to be educated, and I am thankful to them. I paid school taxes when my children were being educated in the public school system. I now pay school taxes to educate other people's children and I do not resent that. We need to be a nation of educated people.
The people of this country have become a bunch of whiners — always trying to make someone else be responsible for anything and everything that they don't want to do or believe they should not have to do.
The fact that they can read this newspaper and write letters to the editor shows that they should be thanking that lack-of-“brains-or-ambition” teacher.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Not clean enough
- Renaming in order?
- Confidence in our courts
- Wolf’s taxes
- Tarentum demolition
- Lying time of year
- ‘PC’ Ebola approach deadly
- Better choice