Should be recognized
In response to the news story “Many high schools in W.Pa. move away from naming single valedictorian” (June 2 and TribLIVE.com): I strongly disagree with the move to dismiss this position of distinction. As the would-be valedictorian at my high school (if it were an acknowledged position) for the Class of 2013, I would like to say that a little friendly competition (mind you, one of academic achievement ) serves as preparation for competition in life.
While it is true that the system has its flaws, the position of valedictorian is an honor earned throughout all four years of high school and should certainly be recognized. It is mentioned by an interviewee in the story that eliminating the valedictorian helped her to become a more well-rounded student. On top of being No. 1 in my class, I am a distinguished member of two varsity sports teams; am involved with marching band, concert band, strings and choir; and am an active member/leader of five different clubs. How much more well-rounded can one get?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Atheists & religious expression
- Thomas’ ‘humanity’
- Fitz draws ire
- Honor Constitution
- Pols’ real interest
- Article painted wrong picture
- Show appreciation