In reading the news story “Procedures to combat hospital infections raise questions” (June 3 and TribLIVE.com), I kept asking myself, “What about basics?”
The story outlined washing high-risk patients with antiseptic wipes and putting antibiotic ointment in their noses. Hold the phone! What happened to basics like washing your hands before and after taking care of a patient?
I know they wear gloves. So? Have you seen them wash their hands before or after using gloves? No! They just put gloves on, then throw them away and put on a new pair. What about the germs that get through the porous gloves?
Basics — like daily changing of patients' bed linens. I know we have to be cost-effective, but what could be more cost-effective than providing clean linens, versus fighting a hospital-acquired infection like MRSA with expensive antibiotics?
Basics — like cleaning patients' rooms every day, changing the water in the bucket between rooms and wet-wiping tables, etc.
These are all very effective infection fighting measures — basics! But even more important is maintaining sterile techniques when required. As a retired registered nurse with 35 years' experience, I feel we need to get back to basics!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ferguson & contradictions
- More answers, please
- Positive & healthy ...
- Thanks for the coverage
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Bring back ‘eagle cam’
- Ferguson & sin
- Blame judges
- Article painted wrong picture
- Hiring in Westmoreland II