By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, June 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I am a 78-year-old Consol Energy Inc. retiree who has fond memories of Consol. I was treated very well, paid very well and given the opportunity to do great things for both Consol and its coal miners.
However, a company is not bricks and mortar, but a reflection of the ethics and competency of all employees, influenced most by the top executives. The management I worked under is long gone.
The new Consol under J. Brett Harvey, chairman and CEO, decided it could no longer afford health coverage of retirees and is terminating it, effective Jan 1, 2014. I was surprised when I read in the news story “Big swings in CEO pay tied to performance of company” (June 2 and TribLIVE.com) that Harvey was paid $17.7 million in 2012. I guess he needed it to put beans on the table.
Top executives are paid well to make tough choices. However, Harvey, along with the top execs of other companies, sold coal miners down the river by not having the guts to stand up and be counted in the recent election, instead hiding behind the feeble efforts of former state Sen. John Pippy. Exceptions are United Mine Workers of America President Cecil Roberts and the owner of the former North American Coal properties.
I guess executives making personal money has become the game in town.
George H. Pudlo
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Math in common?