Wrong on boxing
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, June 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
In the news story “Baldwin Borough's Community Day knocks out boxing” (June 6 and TribLIVE.com), borough manager John Barrett cited violence as his reason for eliminating youth boxing from Community Day. I find this ironic, considering that for some kids in Carrick, where I used to live, the boxing gym is the only alternative to the real violence that kids in troubled families sometimes face.
The sport provides them with healthy alternatives to drugs, plus scholarship opportunities, self-esteem and the dream of someday participating in an Olympic sport. If Barrett is truly concerned about protecting his daughters from violence, he should encourage and revere the kids who choose to spend long hours sweating in the gym instead of hustling in the streets.
Instead of excluding the boxers from the community event, perhaps he should visit a local boxing gym. He would soon notice that the coaches and volunteers there do more to combat youth violence than government censorship ever will.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Proven success
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Funding priorities questioned
- Saved her life
- Ukraine & history
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Conspicuous by absence
- Drought answer?
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66