ShareThis Page

Jeannette's challenges

| Friday, June 14, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

Thank you, Jeannette. Now that the primary is over, I want to thank all those who supported my bid for mayor of Jeannette. I would like to clarify some statements I've made in the effort to take our city in a different direction.

I cannot do this job myself. I need the cooperation of council to forge new ideas and the courage to act. Hard decisions need to be made that will affect this city now and into the future.

I hold no ill will toward anyone or any city service. But there is a time when common sense must become part of the landscape.

The city needs the police force. We surely need a fire department. How, then, do we come to a solution that would ensure a solid foundation for services the citizenry demands and Jeannette, as a third-class city, must fulfill under state guidelines?

These solutions must be met by all parties concerned. It's time to set our differences aside, come together to find the solutions to our problems and get this city out of debt. We as a city cannot afford to battle the “us vs. them” mentality. The future of “‘Jay'-town” hangs in the balance on what we do now, not in the future.

I would like to see a solid foundational change now. It will allow future generations at least the chance to enjoy what we at one time enjoyed.

Once again, I would like to thank all of you who put your trust in me to help find a path to success.

Richard Jacobelli


The writer won Jeannette's Democrat mayoral primary.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.