The field already is level
For all the people in Leechburg supporting the move to the Heritage Conference and spouting “We are leveling the playing field,” look no further than the WPIAL to see the playing field is already level.
Every two years, the WPIAL meets to set scheduling for the upcoming two years. It looks at male enrollment and female enrollment of all schools. It then looks at the numbers and creates the four classes of competition based solely on those numbers.
The Heritage Conference has no need to look at numbers. It has nine teams (10 if Leechburg gets approved by the PIAA) and enrollment means nothing. So, please, all of you who decided to vote for the Heritage Conference based solely on “leveling the playing field,” understand you are not doing that.
Rethink this and step back and look at whom you are hearing from on your choice. Revote this decision. If you cannot step back and hear the people who have been speaking, then you do not deserve my vote again. You are not representing me.
The level playing field is right in front of you. Do not accept mediocrity. Expect more, want more, be more than “level.”
I am the father of three girls who are proud to be Leechburg students and WPIAL athletes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Good riddance
- Punishment pushback II
- Punishment pushback I
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Beware this Wolf I
- Unite on this