Freedom vs. privacy I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, June 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
We all know that tyranny is a constant in the history of human governance, perhaps even in human nature itself. Any thoughtful person would immediately recognize the danger inherent in putting “government” in control of all written data.
Data can easily be corrupted, altered or taken out of context — misused and abused. The current IRS scandal demonstrates the ease with which politicized government employees can abuse their authority and punish innocent citizens. It is flat-out wrong to provide “government” with more overwhelming tools to do so.
Like everyone else, Edward Snowden, who leaked details of two National Security Agency surveillance programs, has only his own moral compass to guide him, and I can respect the choice that he made in this case, dangerous though it might be.
Our national anthem ends with the question: “Oh, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave/O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?” I am concerned that the answer might be “no.”
Richard J. Krauland
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Putin’s actions I
- Drought answer?
- Funding priorities questioned