Ferlo out of line II
Published: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
After hearing of inappropriate and out-of-line remarks about Sheetz made at a June 4 hearing in Harrisburg by state Sen. Jim Ferlo, D-Highland Park, I just had to speak up.
I'm a constituent of state Sen. Tim Solobay, D-Canonsburg, and so far, I haven't heard anything from him on the issue of liquor privatization or the recent inappropriate comments made by both Ferlo and state Rep. Jesse White, D-Cecil.
I want to know why Solobay isn't standing up for his constituents and the people of Western Pennsylvania and working to give them what they want: privatized liquor stores.
I want to know where he is on liquor privatization and how he feels about Ferlo's and White's incredibly inappropriate comments. If he feels these comments were as out of line as I do, I want to know why he hasn't come out and condemned them.
Sen. Solobay, it's time to speak up. Your constituents elected you to give us a voice in Harrisburg, but what we end up with is silence on important local issues.
Mary Beth Fratangeli
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Forcing their beliefs
- Valid comparison?
- Fearful homogenization
- Nukes, not hoops
- Eagles’ plight
- Promotion questionable
- About Quinn & Rose I
- Ethanol’s benefits
- ‘Knockout’ evil
- Name game