Published: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
In response to the Trib mislabeling U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, a “liberal” in the “He's baaaack!” item in “Pittsburgh Tuesday takes” (June 11 and TribLIVE.com): Congressman Murphy has stood up to the president and the Democrats on numerous issues.
He voted against the Wall Street bailouts and the wasteful stimulus program. He has opposed ObamaCare and federal funding of abortions. He has taken the lead in recognizing mass shootings as a mental-health issue, holding town-hall forums on the matter and working to protect the rights of gun owners. He has been strong on national defense and border security.
Therefore, Republicans shouldn't mind if he doesn't toe the party line on every vote, particularly one that benefits union members, who still make up a significant portion of his constituents. In fact, the GOP might be well-served to reach out to blue-collar workers, many of whom are frustrated with the Dems' far-left agenda.
I am proud to have a congressman with a voting record like Murphy's, and around 60 percent of the voters in the 18th Congressional District seem to agree.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ethanol & factory farming
- Government ‘forcing’ I
- Government ‘forcing’ II
- Judges for hire?
- Transportation bill
- Small charitable groups hurting
- School boards’ role
- Buy own insurance
- Wreaths for vets
- About Quinn & Rose I
- Help our troops