ShareThis Page

More for transportation

| Tuesday, June 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

As the General Assembly grapples with how to fund Pennsylvania's deteriorating transportation assets, the Westmoreland County business community would like to weigh in.

Nobody relishes the notion of a fee increase or higher prices at the pump. However, the alternative — continued erosion of infrastructure and inability to provide safer roadways and new capacity — presents greater long-term costs. Facilitating the free flow of goods to the marketplace along with citizens' mobility for business and recreational activities is a core function of government.

Keeping up with routine maintenance of existing infrastructure and targeted expansion — most notably, projects like the Laurel Valley Improvement Project at Route 981 — will require a massive shift of spending priorities for existing revenue or altogether new funding. Paramount to any plan that includes increased funding, transportation officials must be held accountable to identify increased efficiency and innovation to stretch every dollar to its limit.

Our respective organizations unite their voices in support of a comprehensive, long-term, sustainable, multimodal solution. It remains imperative for Pennsylvania to get its transportation house in order with routine maintenance and necessary safety enhancements. At the same time, expansion projects present an opportunity to make Westmoreland County a more attractive place to live and do business.

We recognize that the right decision is not always the most popular one. So we emphatically voice our support to elected officials on this tough issue and encourage the General Assembly to pass a fiscally responsible increase to transportation funding without delay.

Chad Amond, Jason Rigone & Jim Smith

The writers are, respectively, Westmoreland Chamber of Commerce president, Westmoreland County Industrial Development Corp. executive director and Economic Growth Connection of Westmoreland County president and CEO.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.