My fellow generals and admirals of the nonprofit national-security organization Mission: Readiness applaud the state Senate's passage of a comprehensive transportation funding solution (Senate Bill 1) that includes a first-ever dedicated investment in active transportation (walking and biking).
Today, only one-third as many children are walking or biking to school as compared to a generation ago. In that period, childhood obesity rates have tripled. Obesity is now the leading medical reason why one out of four 17-to-24-year-olds cannot join the military. Physical inactivity is a threat not only to public health, but to future national security.
Built environments that afford safe and convenient walking and biking opportunities between schools, parks, residential neighborhoods and commercial corridors encourage more physically active daily routines. American Heart Association data show that for every $1 spent on building safe bike/pedestrian transportation routes, $3 in reduced health care costs can result.
I encourage the state House to pass SB 1, which funds a multimodal transportation system, including a first-ever state investment in making our roads and communities safer for bicyclists and pedestrians.
Investments in active transportation provide a cost-effective opportunity to improve public health and ensure future national security.
Dennis L. Benchoff
The writer is a retired Army lieutenant general and former Army Recruiting Command chief of staff.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.