Freedom vs. privacy III
Published: Saturday, June 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Both the National Security Agency and Google are gathering information, but Google can only offer me something I probably want and don't have to buy. On the other hand, government has the power to make my life miserable, put me in jail or kill me.
Some say you have nothing to fear if you aren't breaking the law, but the law is malleable. What is legal today could be illegal tomorrow, depending on too many factors to elaborate.
I'm not willing to give up freedom for safety.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nukes, not hoops
- Prevailing wage misunderstood
- Privatization disastrous
- ‘Knockout’ evil
- Name game
- Forcing their beliefs
- Democratic Party’s union wing
- Valid comparison?
- Fearful homogenization