No ObamaCare abortions
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, June 27, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
As a woman, I applaud those women in the Pennsylvania General Assembly who took the lead to ensure our taxpayer dollars would not be spent on abortion under ObamaCare.
Thanks to the bill's female sponsor, Rep. Donna Oberlander, R-Clarion, and those women, both Republican and Democrat, who stood with her. Because of these women, the bill passed by a resounding 144-53 vote in the state House, sailed through the Senate and has been signed into law.
National polls show the vast majority of American taxpayers, including 70 percent of women taxpayers, do not want tax dollars to be spent on abortion under federal health care reform.
Thanks to these female public servants for listening to the voices of women throughout the commonwealth and safeguarding their tax dollars.
The writer is the legislative director of the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Funding priorities questioned
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Quit drilling in state forests
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Saved her life
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’