Jesus Christ & Superman
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, June 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
On Father's Day, my daughters and their husbands/boyfriends took my wife and I to see the new Superman movie. Despite the somewhat over-the-top special effects, these did not detract from the obvious references to Christ and Christianity.
It is refreshing to see Hollywood produce a movie unashamed of its religious overtones in the spirit of older, but still relevant, movies, such as “Ben Hur.” “Man of Steel” gives us much food for thought and encourages us to be more than spectators.
In “Man of Steel,” the actors were excellent but, more importantly, director Zack Snyder encouraged strong messages of morality and heroism against impossible odds — the Christian theme of sacrifice so others could live in freedom (a la our Founding Fathers), turning the other cheek before retaliating, and living in a world where one didn't belong, would be idolized, then betrayed and finally embraced.
Equally important is the constant struggle we face today between science/technology and religion/humanity. The aliens from Krypton, who had “evolved” into superhuman beings with great intellectual powers (which eventually led to their own planet's demise), considered Superman weak because he lived among humans and took on many of their frailties. Yet Superman prevailed because he cloaked himself in some of our more noble virtues, such as honor, trust, loyalty and protection of the weak, which he learned from his earthly father.
This movie is not without its flaws. But if it can bring the young, computer geeks, technophiles and scientists to the understanding that religion and morality still hold a significance for us in this fast-paced world, it has performed a valuable service.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns II
- Don’t trash Medicare
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Knives vs. guns I
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- Dems’ tax myth