Share This Page

Navy naiveté

| Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

To Henry M. Rainone, president of the Pittsburgh Council of the Navy League of the United States and writer of the letter “Bigger Navy worth cost” (June 20 and TribLIVE.com): We already spend more on defense than the next 15 countries totaled and they are all allies.

In case you hadn't noticed, the country is broke. Maybe you could take up a door-to-door collection in Upper St. Clair and raise a billion dollars or two from your neighbors.

You also mention how “(t)he people of Pittsburgh proudly produce steel and major machinery for shipbuilding to this day.” Mr. Rainone, the steel mills died in 1985, during the beginning of President Reagan's and the Republican Party's genocide on unions and the middle class.

President Eisenhower was so right when he warned about the military-industrial complex way back when. If we had only listened, we might not be in the massive debt that “tea party patriots” are constantly whining about.

On the front page on the same day your letter ran was the news story “U.S. scraps $7B in military items it can't bring home from Afghanistan” (June 20 and TribLIVE.com). Maybe the Pittsburgh Council of the Navy League can recycle some of this $7 billion in scrap.

Joe Lucas

South Side

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.