Can't beat a government job
The news show “60 Minutes” recently featured a story about how many Americans today are working 60 to 70 hours a week, not 40 hours.
Many ambitious business types are on their laptops or BlackBerrys while still in bed, getting ready for the upcoming day. One working couple spends 10 hours or more at the office, then works at home late into the evening.
Why do some people sacrifice a personal life and work so hard? Because they are afraid that if they do not work extra hard, someone will get ahead or even replace them. With this worry, they work and work — even if it requires that they eschew any type of a personal life.
Now contrast this work ethic by some in the private sector with those in the public sector who have similar jobs. You can bet the vast majority in the public sector — government workers — don't punish themselves in the workplace.
That's because they are not afraid of losing their jobs. Performance anxiety in government work is not nearly the same as performance anxiety in the private sector, where there is a need to make a profit. Government workers have the luxury of job security. Also, many government employees enjoy better pay than private-sector folks.
Government workers have outstanding health care, the kind most private businesses cannot match. They also have a lavish defined pension — no lousy 401(k) for these government-types.
How can I get a government job?
Another question: Who pays for this? We do. We pay and pay and it's still not enough, so we borrow from China, which makes our dollars worth less.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Thomas’ ‘humanity’
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Fitz draws ire
- Pols’ real interest
- Mitochondrial disease awareness