On June 22, the day of the Kenny Chesney concert at Heinz Field, I arranged to meet out-of-town friends at Jerome Bettis' Grille 36 on the North Shore. Traffic was gridlocked! Area lots were full. Where were concert, Carnegie Science Center and restaurant patrons to park? This was a precarious situation for fire and rescue vehicles as well.
In spite of the chaos, traffic police maintained a positive attitude.
Going forward, for such events, there should be:
• Limited pre-paid parking tickets ordered online on a “first come, first served” basis, with lot assignments printed on hang tags and entry after 4 p.m. only. No exceptions!
• Off-site parking destinations (north, south, west and east) with bus transport to the stadium after 4 p.m. — nominal round-trip fee per person.
• No concert parking prior to 4 p.m. by any vehicle. Consideration must be extended to restaurant patrons, handicapped citizens and those employed in the area.
Past generated revenue supports pre-planning; “media blitz” parking ads are a must. At $50 per spot, concertgoers will not be deterred. Remote parking would be utilized as well.
I side with the concertgoers: The number of portable toilets and trash-disposal containers was ridiculous.
Mary Lynne Spazok
Upper St. Clair
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Corbett better choice
- HUD & Larimer
- Tax hits seniors
- Thanks to searchers
- Ignorant on marriage
- Off base on Chatham prez
- Who’s responsible?
- Not one more drop
- Incomprehensible hatred
- HUD at cross-purposes