Misuse of tax-exempt bonds
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, July 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The news story “Trash hauler seeks state aid for landfill improvements in Western Pennsylvania” (June 26 and TribLIVE.com) reported that Waste Management Inc. is seeking $100 million in tax-exempt bonds through a state agency to finance improvements at 16 landfills and recycling centers statewide.
I have to wonder why our state government would provide this form of corporate welfare to a very profitable, stockholder-owned company that would make such “improvements” with its own money absent the government largess.
Waste Management is required to operate its landfills in accordance with environmental laws. Landfill improvements are either mandated by laws or desirable to the company to improve operations and increase profitability. Corporate welfare, such as tax-exempt bonds, is good for companies but bad for taxpayers.
The cost of tax-exempt bonds for all of us is very high, but not really measurable because the cost comes in the form of taxes not being paid that otherwise would have been paid. Reducing this hidden cost would be easy if our legislators would just say “no.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Dingell’s lesson
- Cover many stances
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Resurrection? Really?
- Paying for ‘Fayette’s Folly’
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Stabbings reveal heroics
- Valley musical superb
- Amazing support