End school property taxes
Not a day goes by without a Trib report on a school-district dilemma — budgeting issues, tax increases, cost-cutting measures, the pending pension tsunami. School board meetings resemble the Battle of Gettysburg.
In Sto-Rox, baseball and softball are gone, teachers furloughed; it's “see you later” for cafeteria and maintenance workers, plus library service cutbacks. Southmoreland, Mt. Pleasant and Connellsville are balancing budgets with reserve funds.
The solution is on the table and we haven't heard but a peep from Harrisburg. The saving grace: the Property Tax Independence Act (House Bill 76/Senate Bill 76), which would impose an additional 1-percent sales tax on already taxed items/services and add a long list of previously exempt items. The key point is total abolishment of school property taxes!
Have an average $3,500 school-tax bill? The proposed law would require homeowners to purchase $50,000 in newly taxed items to equal the amount of property tax eliminated.
Worried about taxation on certain “life necessities”? We're already getting whacked on the most basic of all: shelter! Buying a new home? Figure your mortgage, add in your monthly property tax bill — forget it, for most.
One huge issue with this proposed taxing shift: more revenue than our elected officials would know what to do with!
The writer was the Republican candidate for the 58th District seat in the state House in 2010.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett, the reformer
- Sheetz-CVS hearing
- Failing to lead
- Not for expressway
- Far-left continuation
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- Renaming in order?
- Confidence in our courts
- Science on fracking’s side
- Not clean enough