Regarding the letter “No ‘Kumbaya' with liberals” from Bob McBride (July 2): We on the “left” have a proud history, since the founding of our country, in the fight for our constitutional rights and our liberties. Included in this is the fight for freedom of religion and of “non-religion,” should individuals so choose. We fought to preserve democracy in the Spanish Civil War and against fascism in World War II, among others.
This gentleman is misguided in most of his characterizations, but I agree totally with him on the continued erosion of our rights initiated under both the Bush and Obama administrations — endless undeclared wars, National Security Agency spying, the collection of DNA prior to conviction of a crime and the ordered killing of Americans abroad outside of our constitutional provisions.
We've also seen treaties that have stripped our sovereignty and the decision-making role of the Congress and a continued legacy of interfering with the privacy rights of citizens, both liberal and conservative (just read the FBI files from the Palmer raids in 1919 and the McCarthy investigations of the '50s).
One can be opposed to abortion, but recognize that women have the right to make decisions about their own health care, including the difficult decision of abortion. Mr. McBride also should spend less time thinking about sexual acts between consenting adults.
This gentleman should give more consideration to the oppressive, degenerate and bestial side of corporate capitalism, post-1950s to the present. He should think about the role that both major political parties play in their stranglehold on American society and the footstool role they play in this regard.
The writer is the state senator from the 38th District.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.