Snowden: Hero, not traitor
I applaud Edward Snowden. He is a real hero. He actually made the Obama regime blink.
Snowden, once a low-level contractor for the National Security Agency, disclosed disturbing aspects of Big Brother.
I don't object if the Obama regime tracks conversations between terrorists or criminals. However, I suspect these groups already knew the regime was spying on them, so no harm was done.
Snowden and many American citizens are more concerned about the regime spying on political opponents, conservative lawmakers and private businesses.
Illegality neither bothers nor stops this regime. I believe it listens to private communications. If it has the means, it will use them. Blackmail is a very effective tool.
Snowden is not a traitor; he's a whistleblower. He disclosed no national secrets. He disclosed only how information is gathered.
The Obama regime, in defending itself, disclosed more secrets than Snowden. The regime's disclosure of foiled terrorist plots after Snowden went public looks like damage control.
This is a question of national security versus privacy. Put another way: Are you more afraid of the terrorists or the Obama regime? I'll take my chances on the terrorists.
Big Brother is here and he wants to destroy our country. We must stop him before it is too late.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Seek ‘post-combustion future’
- View from Florida
- Hazardous ride
- Terrorism & immigration
- Follow King’s words
- Rethink NFL fandom
- More simply put
- AG’s office no place for porn
- Finally, like Bush
- Hope for spinal cord injuries
- Puzzling trend