Keep Leechburg in the WPIAL
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 4, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
With the Leechburg Area School Board meeting coming up on July 10, I'm hoping the board members have paid attention and come to the realization that our district should not move to the Heritage Conference. I have attended every meeting since I learned of the plan to leave the WPIAL.
The facts are there.
We cannot make this move based simply because the varsity boys basketball coach doesn't want to play against Catholic schools, although we have clearly beaten them over the past 10 years.
Why would we want to drive on rural roads in the snow 60 miles one way at night in December, rather than face rush-hour traffic? And that's just to the opposing school, not on the return trip. This just sounds ridiculous.
I would love to see Leechburg celebrate its 100 years in the WPIAL, which would be my son's 10th grade year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Putin’s actions I
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Putin’s actions II
- Obstacles to hiring