| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Refund fraud fix?

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Saturday, July 6, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

To lessen the hundreds of millions of dollars now being stolen through fraudulent income tax refunds, why not require that all refunds be sent to a bank of the citizen's choice?

None would be sent directly to the income-tax filer. On the IRS 1040 form, you would designate a bank to which your refund should be sent. When your refund arrives at the bank (not yet in your account), your bank notifies you it has arrived, and you visit the bank in person to transfer it into your account — but only after providing identification. This would solve much of the theft problem.

Paying the banks a small fee to handle this service would be far cheaper than the hundreds of millions of dollars now being stolen through fraudulent refunds. It would also prevent such checks from being stolen from mailboxes or lost.

And this effort would save the IRS (and taxpayers) millions of dollars by eliminating the printing and mailing of the checks.

Why wouldn't this work better than the current mess?

Bob Logue


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Don’t blame the union
  2. Trump beats status quo
  3. Kids, parents & school
  4. Confederate pride: Why?
  5. Buyer beware
  6. Feel safer?
  7. Help Israel, not Iran
  8. ATI’s misleading ad
  9. ATI abandoned its own
  10. Unfit either way
  11. Of a Fine man & friend