| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Misleading on disability

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, July 11, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

As an attorney who represents people with disabilities, I found The Associated Press news stories “Disability judges too lax, House investigators say” and “Judges tell House panel they are pressured to approve Social Security disability benefits” (June 25, June 28 and extremely misleading.

In fact, administrative law judges' (ALJs') allowance rates have fallen significantly since 2007.

To explain, there are a number of legitimate reasons why ALJs reverse state-agency disability determinations.

Most claimants wait at least a year for an ALJ hearing; in many cases, their conditions have deteriorated with the passage of time.

ALJs are able to call expert medical and vocational witnesses to provide further explanation of the claimant's impairments, treatment and functional limitations affecting work. Often at the hearing, previously missing records have been collected and the judge has a much more complete record to make a decision.

I know firsthand that strict eligibility standards and medical evidence are required to prove that an individual is disabled. Many applicants are terminally ill — about one in five male and one in six female beneficiaries die within five years of receiving benefits.

Get the facts straight.

Cindy Berger

The writer is a founding partner of the Pittsburgh law firm Berger and Green ( and vice president of the National Association of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Students’ debt to repay
  2. Condescending interviewee
  3. USW not cause of ATI woes
  4. ATI ‘ate its own’
  5. ‘Deflategate’ fault NFL’s
  6. Burden eased
  7. Blight cure dubious
  8. Major issue, no action
  9. Seal the borders
  10. States & secession
  11. Catholicism & science