When U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., voted against the Hurricane Sandy relief bill this year, he said he wanted to do the right thing but didn't want to place the financial burden on our grandkids. Toomey could have done the right thing when immigration reform was brought up for a vote.
Voting in favor of immigration reform would have given him the opportunity to reduce our deficit. Senate Republicans voted with Democrats on comprehensive immigration reform because it creates a path to citizenship, secures our border and brings in hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes, fees and fines paid by undocumented workers. Despite this, Toomey voted against the bill.
There is a pattern when Toomey tries to turn talk into action. He talks about the need to educate the next generation of Americans, but he fails to act on lowering student loan rates. He says we need to help returning soldiers, but votes against job training programs for veterans.
This isn't the leadership we were promised. If Toomey happens to be near you, ask him to take action instead of just talking.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Amendment levels playing field
- It’s not personal
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Buffer zones needed II
- Off base on Chatham prez
- Getting bad advice
- Comprehensible failures
- Diplomatic difference
- Seeking Christ in kids