| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Sweet reform

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Friday, July 19, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

In reference to the editorial “The farm bill: So much so wrong” (June 23 and This year's farm bill would have made substantive changes to nearly every commodity program operated by the federal government except the sugar program. While an amendment offering modest reforms was defeated in favor of the status quo, we applaud U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Chester County, who has worked tirelessly for sugar reform and our other representatives who voted for the amendment.

Currently, the government controls who can grow and process sugar and how much can be imported. These controls are for one purpose: guaranteeing that sugar producers and processors always profit.

When sugar prices are high, consumers pay nearly double the world market rate; when prices are low, the government bails out sugar producers.

Over the next few years, American taxpayers could pay hundreds of millions of dollars to purchase surplus sugar — all to artificially raise the price that food manufacturers, like Pennsylvania confectioners, will pay for this ingredient.

The sugar program is failed policy that threatens Pennsylvania businesses, growth and job creation. We encourage our Pennsylvania legislators to continue to push for sugar-program reform in any new farm bill.

Peter Blommer

& Ross Born

The writers are, respectively, president and CEO of Blommer Chocolate Co. in East Greenville and co-CEO of candy-maker Just Born Inc. in Bethlehem.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. All killing is wrong
  2. Crucial NATO partner
  3. More than next job
  4. ‘Boots’ not answer
  5. Glass house?
  6. Not ‘pension reform’
  7. Quit hitting up the taxpayers
  8. ‘Fifty Shades’ of shame
  9. Obama blame game
  10. Exposed to temptation
  11. Ignorance, arrogance