Big mouth, no clue
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, July 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
NSA snitch and fugitive Edward Snowden needs public-relations help — badly. From the moment he blew his whistle on NSA snooping practices, he became an anti-hero.
By definition, anti-heroes are uber-cool. Think Dirty Harry, Rambo, Jack Reacher — men who boldly play by their own rules against “The System.”
Snowden was a bona fide, flesh-and-blood Jason Bourne, thumbing his nose at the U.S. government in a way few of us would dare to dream.
Journalists and Hollywood would have walked on molten lava for his story. All he had to do was shut up and stay mysterious, for as the beer commercial teaches, “The World's Most Interesting Man” is a man of few words.
No, Snowden had to publicly howl about how President Obama is blocking his path to political asylum.
Geez, Ed, when you give up state secrets, hopscotch across international borders without permission and snuggle in the bosom of the USA's old Cold War adversary, what in the name of Benedict Arnold do you expect? You can't reboot this game, my friend.
Hero or rat, Snowden is no real-world Bourne. He's just another whiny, maladjusted “geekazoid” in a corner cubicle. With a big mouth. And no clue.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns I
- Knives vs. guns II
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- Consequences in space
- Valley musical superb
- Parental dysfunction
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Spring captured