Share This Page

Don't share PD

| Wednesday, July 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Regarding the “Latrobe's next step” item in “Greensburg Tuesday takes” (July 2 and TribLIVE.com): The idea of Unity Township sharing a police department with Latrobe opens the door for Unity taxpayers to share in the legacy costs of the Latrobe Police Department.

Early retirements in police and fire departments, combined with entitlements for pensions and health coverage for life, have crippled the budgets of many cities. These cities are often burdened with more retirees than active workers. Union power prevents these systems from ever being changed.

Unity taxpayers need to stay as far away from the Latrobe Police Department as possible. Latrobe voters should pay for the system they allowed to be created.

Richard Johnson

Unity

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.