War against plant food
Published: Saturday, July 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Carbon dioxide is plant food while carbon monoxide is pollution. By lumping all carbon as bad, the media and President Obama have turned plant food into an enemy.
The science of climate change supposedly has arrived at consensus without any real debate, and anyone who questions plant food as a climate changer is a heretic.
Carbon dioxide is not our enemy. The media and the president are perpetuating a myth as powerfully wrong as the flat Earth theory. Limiting carbon with taxes and regulations will limit the pursuit of happiness.
Carbon dioxide is the staff of life on Earth. Why would anyone oppose plant food?
The Earth has had warmer periods than today, and carbon dioxide was many times higher when volcanoes fed the plant life that fed the dinosaurs. The American methane revolution is about to change everything about our world, and our president and media are tilting at windmills and blaming man-made plant food for every weather event.
Mother Nature makes 95 percent of the world's carbon dioxide. Freedom and prosperity revolve around abundant and cheap energy, not tax-happy central planners and their soft inquisition.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ethanol & factory farming
- School boards’ role
- Boys’ need real
- Unreasonable 300 percent
- Failing patients & public
- Government ‘forcing’ I
- Government ‘forcing’ II
- Bowls & awards
- The demise of freedom